Ken Tetterington guest post

Today's post is thanks to Ken Tetterington  an inventor from Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Ken has a great web site that you might want to visit. There is a link to his web site at the end of this article as well as on this blog page under the links menu. Now here is Ken's exciting article.

Mankind has long desired to create a device that puts out more energy than is taken in.  Although science considers it against established laws, nature indeed offers many such examples, such as in the case of a waterfall that powers a turbine and related weather patterns replenishing the waterfalls water supply.

Fluxite is a private Edmonton company that has spent over 8 years examining various methods to create a device that would use a natural energy source and convert it to electricity. Fluxite is 100% owned and financed by Ken Tetterington.  Mr. Tetterington was the founder of 3 public companies, including Tetratel Inc (TIN: CDNX), Segway 3 Corp (Pink Sheets), and most recently, Splitfish Gameware Inc. (54S: Frankfurt).  He has also filed in excess of 20 patents worldwide for various inventions.
During this time, Fluxite has explored countless free energy claims on the Internet, such as magnetics, transformers, power increasers, generators, and chemical reactions.  So far the methods of others have turned out to be cleaver designs used to promote exposure or entrap unsuspecting investors.

It needs to be said that, the heart of every valid invention is having a valid workable theory. This is the core of the current Fluxite energy generator.  Tests are first conducted to try to prove or disprove details of a theory, then after all tests are acceptable, an invention can be designed and built.  After years of testing, if the core theory proves not to be valid, then the theory is shelved and a new theory is examined.

At this stage, Fluxite is building a prototype that has passed all such tests and it is hoped that a working device can be produced from the theory.  The core of the theory rewrites what electricity is and how it interacts with the world.  To date, many trained in the art are taught how electricity works and how to apply that understanding however it has not yet been explained what electricity is in the first place.

A short explanation of a working principal is in order.  We have concluded, at least for our purposes, that electricity is not a particle but rather a magnetic ‘bubble’.  This is very similar to a magnets field in that these electrical bubbles repel (push) other bubbles however they dissipate after a short time.  Furthermore these bubbles do not have a pole such as a magnet.  The magnetic portion of the bubbles repel only.  These bubbles also appear to have, at their core, what is commonly thought of as an electrostatic particle.  Although, once again, we concluded this is not a particle but rather a force field or attraction bubble.  These two features in combination allows ‘electricity bubbles’ to repel (push) each other and have an attraction component (pull) which allows them to travel along a conductive surface.  This explanation is of the simplest terms as the discussion is not what electricity is but rather how to capitalize on its forces.

Now, in our experiments we have proved that static electricity exists without a magnetic field. This is to say that we can split out the pull (static electricity) from the pull (magnetic energy).  We can further ascertain that the push of electricity is not equal in power of its pull (more powerful).  Without going into great detail in this matter, we can then propose a theory based on our own internal tests and experiments.

Once again, in the simplest terms, what we then need to do is to use the pull (strongest) component of electricity and apply it against its own push (weakest). This imbalance is what we are attempting to use to power our generator.
We never follow a time schedule when building an invention, and as such we cannot say when or if the device will work as expected. All we can say is that out of the hundreds of concepts and ideas, ours is the most likely to succeed, based on real world models such as weather patterns and how energy has unequal push and pull components.

by Ken Tetterington


www.Fluxite.com:                                  info@Fluxite.com

Hope you all enjoyed Ken's article and have looked at his website. If you have any questions for Ken you can email him at info@Fluxite.com

Yesterday I had a reader call me a free energy kook, maybe I am but I personally believe that there is a need for more development in alternative energy devices. If that means that I am a kook so be it.

Until next time keep on inventing.